{"id":11264,"date":"2025-09-26T12:52:29","date_gmt":"2025-09-26T07:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.iq\/?p=11264"},"modified":"2025-09-26T22:03:04","modified_gmt":"2025-09-26T17:03:04","slug":"million-year-old-skull-could-change-human-evolution-timeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/million-year-old-skull-could-change-human-evolution-timeline\/","title":{"rendered":"Million-year-old skull could change human evolution timeline"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A digital reconstruction of a million-year-old skull suggests humans may have diverged from our ancient ancestors 400,000 years earlier than thought and in Asia not Africa, a study said Friday.<\/p>\n<p>The findings are based on a reconstruction of a crushed skull discovered in China in 1990, and have the potential to resolve the longstanding &#8220;Muddle in the Middle&#8221; of human evolution, researchers said.<\/p>\n<p>But experts not involved in the work cautioned that the findings were likely to be disputed, and pointed to ongoing uncertainties in the timeline of human evolution.<\/p>\n<p>The skull, labelled Yunxian 2, was previously thought to belong to a human forerunner called Homo erectus.<\/p>\n<p>But modern reconstruction technologies revealed features closer to species previously thought to have existed only later in human evolution, including the recently discovered Homo longi and our own Homo sapiens.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This changes a lot of thinking,&#8221; said Chris Stringer, an anthropologist at the Natural History Museum, London, who was part of the research team.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It suggests that by one million years ago, our ancestors had already split into distinct groups, pointing to a much earlier and more complex human evolutionary split than previously believed,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p>If the findings are correct, it suggests there could have been much earlier members of other early hominins, including Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, the study says.<\/p>\n<p>It also &#8220;muddies the waters&#8221; on longstanding assumptions that early humans dispersed from Africa, said Michael Petraglia, director of Griffith University&#8217;s Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, who was not involved in the research.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a big change potentially happening here, where east Asia is now playing a very key role in hominin evolution,&#8221; he told AFP.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8216;A lot of questions&#8217; &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>The research, published in the journal Science, used advanced CT scanning, structure light imaging and virtual reconstruction techniques to model a complete Yunxian 2.<\/p>\n<p>The scientists relied in part on another similar skull to shape their model, and then compared it to over 100 other specimens.<\/p>\n<p>The resulting model &#8220;shows a distinctive combination of traits,&#8221; the study said, some of them similar to Homo erectus, including a projecting lower face.<\/p>\n<p>But other aspects, including its apparently larger brain capacity, are closer to Homo longi and Homo sapiens, the researchers said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yunxian 2 may help us resolve what&#8217;s been called the &#8216;Muddle in the Middle,&#8217; the confusing array of human fossils from between 1 million and 300,000 years ago,&#8221; Stringer said in a press release.<\/p>\n<p>Much about human evolution remains debated, and Petraglia said the study&#8217;s findings were &#8220;provocative&#8221; though grounded in solid work.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s sound, but I think the jury&#8217;s still out. I think there will be a lot of questions raised,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Andy Herries, an archeologist at La Trobe University, said he was not convinced by the conclusions and that genetic analysis had shown fossil morphology, or shape, was &#8220;not always a perfect indicator for human evolution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They&#8217;ve got this interpretation that I just don&#8217;t really think is taking into account the genetic histories of these things that we do know,&#8221; he told AFP.<\/p>\n<p>The findings are only the latest in a string of recent research that has complicated what we thought we know about our origins.<\/p>\n<p>Homo longi, also known as &#8220;Dragon Man&#8221;, was itself only named as a new species and close human relative in 2021, by a team that included Stringer.<\/p>\n<p>The authors said their work illustrates the complexity of our shared history.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fossils like Yunxian 2 show just how much we still have to learn about our origins,&#8221; said Stringer.<\/p>\n<p>sah\/hmn<\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 Agence France-Presse<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A digital reconstruction of a million-year-old skull suggests humans may have diverged from our ancient ancestors 400,000 years earlier than thought and in Asia not Africa, a study said Friday. The findings are based on a reconstruction of a crushed skull discovered in China in 1990, and have the potential to resolve the longstanding &#8220;Muddle [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":11265,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_sitemap_exclude":false,"_sitemap_priority":"","_sitemap_frequency":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"subtitle":"","format":"standard","override":[{"template":"7","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"left-sidebar","sidebar":"default-sidebar","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"topbottom","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_share_counter":"1","show_view_counter":"1","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"1","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"1","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","show_zoom_button":"0","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_post_tag":"1","show_prev_next_post":"1","show_popup_post":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_author_box":"1","show_post_related":"0","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0"},"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"jnews_post_split":{"post_split":[{"template":"1","tag":"h2","numbering":"asc","mode":"normal","first":"0","enable_toc":"0","toc_type":"normal"}]},"footnotes":""},"categories":[198],"tags":[1901,220,1900,1180,472,568],"class_list":["post-11264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-miscellaneous","tag-anthropology","tag-archaeology","tag-evolution","tag-palaeontology","tag-research","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11264"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11264\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.iq\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}